New York University's independent student newspaper, established in 1973.

Washington Square News

New York University's independent student newspaper, established in 1973.

Washington Square News

New York University's independent student newspaper, established in 1973.

Washington Square News

A mural of a woman’s face holding up a chain with the word “LOISAIDA” and a gold cityscape. The words “el bohio murals” and “#BRINGARTBACK” are next to the woman alongside the words “CURATED BY … THRIVECOLLECTIVE.ORG.”
Activists’ 25-year fight to revive an East Village community center
Dharma Niles, Deputy News Editor • Mar 12, 2024
A front entrance with the text “Electric Lady Studios” written in a retro white font on two reflective walls.
‘An exploitative environment’: The interns behind Electric Lady Studios
Julia Diorio, Music Editor • Feb 20, 2024

Definition of terror should be re-examined

The weeks after the Boston bombings have been quite distressing not only because of the violence of the act itself, but also because of the ‘political violence’ embraced by subsequent media coverage and given credence by our elected officials’ behavior. Perhaps we have to rethink what constitutes as violence and even terror.

Traditionally, an act constitutes terror if it was ideologically motivated to terrorize. Thus, random shootings — such as those in Aurora and Sandy Hook, which are psychological or sociopathic events, do not constitute terror because they are not motivated by any particular ideology.  But there are serious flaws with this type of logic.

If we explore the aftermath of the tragedy in Boston more deeply, we can see that the Tsarnaev brothers were not the only agents responsible for spreading terror. Numerous politicians and corporate media entities raised Islamophobia so that all Muslims were the enemy. However, in reality the suspects’ actual time spent in the north Caucasus was relatively brief.  This Islamophobia perpetrated by the media may not have been intentional. Nevertheless, it became an alternative form of terror because it targeted and terrorized Muslims simply for being Muslims.

The actual lockdown of Boston created terror as well. Disregarding the debate about whether the lockdown was justified, one can still say that the image of an elite and militarized police force with heavily armored tanks patrolling the streets produced terror. More alarming is the fact that police forces were being steadily transformed into de facto military units even before the Boston bombings.

Now, some elected officials are discussing ways to create ever-stricter policing policies in response to the Boston events.  For example, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg went so far as to say that traditional interpretations of the U.S. Constitution must be loosened to allow government to implement greater security measures. I wonder what greater security measures Bloomberg wants to institute, since he already boasted about heading the 7th largest army in the world – the NYC police. The role of the police should be to protect us, but instead we fear them. And isn’t this the ultimate goal of terror — to atomize the society by instilling fear?

Perhaps inflicting violence is one distinct form of terror, something entirely different from merely inciting fear of violence from others. But the long term consequences of inciting fear can be equally dangerous, used to justify U.S. imperialism.

If agents such as states can unintentionally produce various forms of terror, how can we have a stable mechanism to define terrorism? Attempting to codify a definition for terror neglects the ways in which our society enables — though not directly causes — events such as the Boston bombings to happen in the first place, i.e. US imperialism. Arguably, the U.S. Government incites terror as much, if not more, than foreign powers. This happens both domestically, but also in other countries, e.g., drone strikes in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

By seeking to codify and stabilize the definition, we disregard the possibilities of state violence from conceptualizations of terrorism.

Correction: An earlier version of this article included text that was not intended for publication.

A version of this article appeared in the Wednesday, May 1 edition. Edward Radzivilovskiy is deputy opinion editor. Email him at [email protected].

 

View comments (2)
More to Discover

Comments (2)

Comments that are deemed spam or hate speech by the moderators will be deleted.
All Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

  • C

    Chelsea R.Nov 9, 2015 at 6:02 pm

    Horrible, asinine article. Please construct your arguments in a more coherent and less laughable fashion in the future for anyone to take you seriously. Some of us have lived in New York long enough to remember the attacks, and some of us have even lost family members. Hate the government as you will, but kindly do not spit in their memory.

    Reply
  • A

    AsianMay 1, 2013 at 5:34 pm

    I’m guessing this suggests that Mr. Bloomberg and the NYC police are the the real terrorists?

    Read more on global geopolitics, most Pakistanis and Afghans are not fond of the US, but they quietly prefer it to the Taliban that causes real terrorism every week in their nations. Without intervention, their societies and governments would have long since collapsed by now.

    This is a really weak, biased and vague article…even most Russians would not sympathize with the Islamists as much as you do. Did you read about the 2 teenagers that got killed recently in Russia due to a terrorist attack? By the same token, is Russian Islamophobia responsible for that as well?

    Reply