New York University's independent student newspaper, established in 1973.

Washington Square News

New York University's independent student newspaper, established in 1973.

Washington Square News

New York University's independent student newspaper, established in 1973.

Washington Square News

A mural of a woman’s face holding up a chain with the word “LOISAIDA” and a gold cityscape. The words “el bohio murals” and “#BRINGARTBACK” are next to the woman alongside the words “CURATED BY … THRIVECOLLECTIVE.ORG.”
Activists’ 25-year fight to revive an East Village community center
Dharma Niles, Deputy News Editor • Mar 12, 2024
A front entrance with the text “Electric Lady Studios” written in a retro white font on two reflective walls.
‘An exploitative environment’: The interns behind Electric Lady Studios
Julia Diorio, Music Editor • Feb 20, 2024

Geneva II talks fall short, prove ineffective

Yesterday afternoon, the Syria peace talks in Geneva produced their first breakthrough. The UN mediator Lakhdar Brahimi reported that both parties have agreed upon conditions under which women and children are allowed to leave the besieged city of Homs, Syria. Although this deal marks an important first step in these talks, it falls critically short of both what was expected and what is needed. Indeed, Brahimi conceded that it would take time “to bring Syria out of the ditch in which it has fallen.” If the peace process takes too long, President Bashar al-Assad will be left appearing as a partner in the process while continuing to decimate his people.

The Geneva II Conference’s aim is to make steps toward a transitional government in Syria. The meeting comes more than a year after the initial discussion on peace in Syria began. In June 2012, an action group, with the support of all five permanent members of the UN Security Council, devised an outline for international intervention in Syria and the goals any potential political settlements would need to meet. With those guidelines in place, Geneva II has resulted in several peace talks between Syrian opposition and the incumbent government, but the efforts seem worryingly perfunctory.

The talks are unlikely to precipitate a regime change with the current ineffectual Syrian delegation. Assad seems to have played his political cards just right. By sending a powerless delegation to Geneva II, he may hang on to the presidency. The only deals without Assad’s involvement will be minor guarantees of further humanitarian relief and brief ceasefires in return for western aid.

While political talks have continued, the death toll has risen dramatically. Recently, evidence was uncovered that revealed the systematic killing of roughly 11,000 detainees. Many of the corpses showed signs of torture. The evidence is more detailed than most other documentation of the war crimes in Syria and could be used to indict Syrian officials.

While the developments of Geneva II may appear conducive to Syrian peace, spectators must remain cognizant of the looming risks with feeble rewards. Although the talks may have produced a minor victory for women and children, true progress cannot be achieved until the negotiators stop ignoring the actual problem. Warfare is waged by the Assad regime on its own citizens, from relentless blockades to air strikes to inhumane imprisonment. Discussions that fail to produce meaningful action against these jarring realities are not only woefully neglectful of civilian suffering but also perpetuate Assad’s crimes against humanity.

A version of this article appeared in the Monday, Jan. 27 print edition. Email the WSN Editorial Board at [email protected].

View comments (2)

Comments (2)

Comments that are deemed spam or hate speech by the moderators will be deleted.
All Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

  • A

    ArafatJan 27, 2014 at 10:45 am

    For the last hundred years the best and brightest of the
    civilized world have been engaged in the business of peace. In the days before
    the Nobel Peace Prize became a joke, it was expected that scientific progress
    would lead to moral progress. Nations would accept international laws and
    everyone would get together to replace wars with international conferences.

    Instead technological progress just gave us better ways to
    kill each other. There have been few innovations in the moral technology of
    global harmony since Immanuel Kant’s “Perpetual Peace” laid out a plan to grant
    world citizenship to all refugees and outlaw all armies, invasions and
    atrocities with the whole shebang would be overseen by a League of Nations.

    That was in 1795 and Kant’s plan was at least more
    reasonable than anything we have two-hundred years later today because it at
    least set out to limit membership in this body to free republics. If we had
    done that with the United Nations, it could conceivably have become something
    resembling a humane organization. Instead it’s a place where the dictators of
    the world stop by to give speeches about human rights for a show that’s funnier
    than anything you could find eight blocks away at the Broadway Comedy Club.

    Reply
  • A

    ArafatJan 27, 2014 at 10:43 am

    This reminds me of how well the UN did/has done in Sudan. Now the Muslim jihadists are waging a slow war of attrition against Southern Sudan.
    ………………..

    No, the UN is not a club of morons. It has become a
    multi-billion-dollar bureaucracy of career wonks, parasites, moochers, useless
    diplomats, well-paid support staff, professional courtiers, ass-kissers,
    flesh-eating zombies, and altruist snobs, paid for largely by U.S.
    contributions and dues. The UN is a signal instance of how we are paying for
    our own destruction.

    There isn’t a single UN agency that has done a lick of good. It
    has never solved the “problems” of hunger, disease, and poverty, and
    never will, because it has a vested interest in perpetuating those things. The
    only good thing it has done was to approve the creation of Israel, and that was
    in the way of an apology for the West not having opposed Nazi Germany early
    enough to prevent WWII, as a kind of compensation for the Holocaust.

    No good could ever come from a formal association with what has
    become a clique of dictatorships, authoritarian régimes, welfare states, and
    feudal monarchies, for the alleged purpose of advancing “peace.” But
    ever since its creation the world has seen more strife, turmoil, butchery,
    misery, and slaughter than in any other period of human history, except perhaps
    during the Dark Ages, when the competition in death was between disease and
    savages.

    Reply