Washington Square News

Cell Phones: Harming Your Skin?

%0AIt+turns+out+that+iPhones+are+dirtier+than+toilets%2C+so+avoid+the+germs+and+use+headphones+or+earphones+instead.+%0A

It turns out that iPhones are dirtier than toilets, so avoid the germs and use headphones or earphones instead.

It turns out that iPhones are dirtier than toilets, so avoid the germs and use headphones or earphones instead.

Anna Letson

Anna Letson

It turns out that iPhones are dirtier than toilets, so avoid the germs and use headphones or earphones instead.

By Michaela Hoffman, Staff Writer

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






You’ve probably heard from a nervous parent or from the internet that cell phones can cause cancer. Now, there’s another rumor circulating that is causing panic amongst beauty fanatics: the light emitted from your cell phone is damaging your skin. After all, the average millennial cumulatively spends almost an entire day on his or her smartphone every week, according to a TNS study. But just how bad is the smartphone light emission for your skin?

First, let’s debunk the idea that cell phones cause cancer. All cell phones emit a form of energy called radiofrequency radiation, which sounds scarier than it actually is. This radiation can be categorized into two types, based on the amount of energy created: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. Ionizing radiation consists of high-energy waves that are often emitted by x-ray machines. Non-ionizing radiation contains low-energy waves that are emitted by microwaves and your beloved cell phone. Exposure to ionizing radiation, such as from X-rays, is known to increase the risk of cancer. Non-ionizing radiation has not been proven to cause cancer. Everyone can breathe a sigh of relief now.

The other question still remains: can the light emitted from a smartphone damage your skin? There might be some truth in this statement, according to Koko Hayashi, a Japanese esthetician and founder of Mirau Clinical. Research in Japan has found that “blue light,” or high-energy visible light emitted from your phones, computers and tablets, penetrates deeper into the layers of your skin than the sun’s UV rays and therefore accelerates aging.

“Its damages really worse than UVB or UVA, [hitting the] skin deeper, where collagen or hyaluronic acid or elastin resides,” Hayashi said.

There are some beauty products sold in Japan that protect your skin from HEV light, but few products have been sold in the U.S. Hyashi also notes that there is a very low amount of information on this topic in the U.S., which is not surprising.

Here’s why you shouldn’t worry too much about HEV light: there simply isn’t enough research to confidently back up that claim. One study from 2008 found that HEV light from phones delays the recovery of your skin barrier from exposure to the environment. Another from 2014 concluded that that blue-violet light, compared to UVB light, resulted in more pronounced hyperpigmentation in the skin that lasts for up to three months. While there are several studies out there, there is not enough information about long-term skin damage from HEV lights from phones.

HEV lights may not be the only way that your phone is damaging your skin. Plenty of studies have been conducted on the fact that your cell phone contains high amounts of bacteria — sometimes more than a toilet seat —  which can cause face and neck acne. It’s also no secret that the LED light from your phone can throw off your internal sleep rhythm, making it harder to fall asleep and therefore causing under-eye circles and crow’s feet.

Ultimately, it is safe to conclude that your cell phone doesn’t have to be the cause of your skin’s demise, as long as you use it properly.

Email Michaela Hoffman at [email protected]

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






About the Writer
Michaela Hoffman, Violet Vision Editor
Michaela Hoffman is the Violet Vision Editor for the Washington Square News. She is a freshman in the Liberal Studies Program and hails from Albany, NY. When Michaela to the big city this past fall, Michaela traded in her #basic but comfortable UGG boots for knee-high boots, “in the name of fashion.” However, she is a firm...
3 Comments

3 Responses to “Cell Phones: Harming Your Skin?”

  1. Dave Ashton on November 7th, 2016 6:54 am

    Hi,

    I have to challenge, or perhaps debunk, this statement: “First, let’s debunk the idea that cell phones cause cancer”.

    This is precisely what the scientific evidence points towards; that the pulsed microwave radiation from cell phones, cell towers, wi-fi, smart meters, DECT cordless phones, Bluetooth devices, microwave-emitting drones, satellites and balloons, wearables, etc. etc. , DOES cause cancer, and DOES cause DNA breaks.

    Remember that IARC classified this radiation as a Group 2B carcinogen in 2011, on the basis of an increased risk of gliomas?

    Also, remember that the recent partial results of the National Toxicology Program study looking at whether 2G/3G radiation caused cancer and DNA damage in the test animals, found that it did?

    We are now all exposed to the pulsed microwave radiation from wireless devices and infrastructure 24/7. The majority of the non-industry, non-conflicted scientific evidence suggests that this is having catastrophic consequences (please see the Bioinitiative Report, and the International EMF Scientist Appeal).

    I’m afraid that the consequences of our wireless infatuation are much more than just skin deep….

  2. Wilma Miles on November 7th, 2016 7:37 am

    Re ‘You’ve probably heard from a nervous parent or from the internet that cell phones can cause cancer.’ Please note: Insurers do not cover health damages from mobile phones. For the past two decades, secondary insurers such as Lloyds of London and Swiss Re have refused to cover the telecommunications industry for health damages from mobile phones and other wireless devices, So the insurance industry seems to be ‘nervous’ too!

  3. veronica on November 7th, 2016 1:46 pm

    There is massive research showing biological effects from exposure to wireless radiation. These effects are nonthermal in nature and have been known for decades. Our own government has released several of its own documents where they acknowledge the athermal effects. The recent NTP study showed a dose-response relationship with wireless radiation and cancer. The WHO has classified it as a class 2b carcinogen. There are 223 scientists who are asking to move it to an even higher ranking. The industry says it is safe–and so does there research which is no surprise. The tobacco industry also said that cigarettes were safe. Then they said second hand smoking was safe. The asbestos industry said asbestos was safe. The pharmaceutical industry says all the drugs are safe too until there is a recall happening constantly. People really got sick and died from what they keep telling us is “safe”. The industry and protective agencies seem to be lacking discernment as to what is true and what is propaganda. Don’t you make that same mistake least you or your loved one become a statistic for future generations.

Comments that are deemed spam or hate speech by the moderators will be deleted.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.