Washington Square News

We Need Fewer WASPs, More Minority Authors

By Aparna Alankar, Staff Writer

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






Discussions of diversifying faculty appointments are currently circulating in the NYU English department. In a revamping of the English major curriculum itself to be more inclusive of literature from around the world, the department foresees carrying over this initiative to a more student-based platform in the next few year. While this is a great effort by the university towards inclusivity, these efforts to diversity should ultimately be initiated sooner, if not right now — especially given the current political climate.

The English major curriculum is, at present, heavily oriented towards authors of Christian white male descent. Core courses include British Literature I and II, American Literature I and English 101. Depending on a student’s choice of English 101 section, his or her introduction to the study of literature may be more based on the literature of minorities than that of others. However, the other core courses remain very much fixed in being both very Western and very white. Students in British Literature read works written by authors such as Marie de France, Geoffrey Chaucer, Thomas Wyatt, Queen Elizabeth, Aemilia Lanyer and John Donne. Majors can choose to diversify their individual tracks of study with a further selection of courses. However, when one of these courses is a mandated exploration into British Literature before 1800, it is fair to say that the curriculum is not as based in diverse works as it should be.

The department recently held a plenary lecture which explored the possibilities of incorporating “world literature” into the English major syllabus. World literature was defined to be literature which circulates outside of its cultural origin. South Asian literature, African American literature and Malaysian literature all fall under this umbrella. Problems with such an expansion were brought up as well — students unfamiliar with the language of origin would ultimately not be able to apply the “close-reading” method to such texts. While valid, it is more than acceptable for a work to not be accessible to the entirety of an audience. Works that stem from Anglo-Saxon culture daily challenge international students who are not raised in the Western culture. The push to get students to actively confront unfamiliar works should surpass the difficulties of reading in translation.

Students are exposed to a different voice, a different perspective and to opportunity deepen their study of literature when they are given more diverse materials to work with. An expansion of the syllabus would also likely bring in more students of diverse backgrounds to pursue the English major, and therefore perspectives to better inform classroom discussions of literature. Ultimately, the initiative by the English department to diversify faculty appointments should be carried on to the English major curriculum itself. Such an expansion would better enrich the major’s study of literature, and is an especially relevant concern in our current political state.

Opinions expressed on the editorial pages are not necessarily those of WSN, and our publication of opinions is not an endorsement of them.

Email Aparna Alankar at [email protected]

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






2 Comments

2 Responses to “We Need Fewer WASPs, More Minority Authors”

  1. Daniel Francis on November 30th, 2016 2:29 pm

    What we need is free publication of authors. Let readers decide merit. What we don’t need are people like you who prescribe criteria other than merit.

  2. Carlyn on December 2nd, 2016 3:18 pm

    First of all, I agree with Daniel. The English curriculum should be based on works of greatest merit. Second of all, I’m a bit confused- the English major, as I understand it, is focused on English literature. A majority of literature written in the English language comes from America and Britain. Thirdly, I would think that very few students today, Western or Non-Western, would be able to relate to authors like Shakespeare, John Donne, or Chaucer. On that same note, reading literature is not about identifying with the author or characters. If someone can’t stand to read Plato solely because he is a white man and they can therefore not identify with him, they aren’t intelligent enough to be reading Plato.

    Sincerely, a female agnostic English majors who adores the authors you mentioned

Comments that are deemed spam or hate speech by the moderators will be deleted.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.